Academic Writing Roadmap — from question to outline, citations, and revision

学習・教育

Academic Writing Roadmap — from question to outline, citations, and revision

Open this template the day the deadline is set, before you write a single paragraph. The whiteboard holds the finish conditions and marking criteria, the question → research → outline → draft → revise flow, a table of claim, evidence, and source for each chapter, a 2x2 for deciding how to use each source, and the traps that cost marks at submission. The task board makes set the question, gather sources, build the outline, draft the body, and revise and submit into parent tasks, each with two concrete subtasks.

0 いいね 0 コピー 作者: WeProcess
report academic citations outline revision
無料登録してこのテンプレートを使う

無料登録すると、マーケットプレイスからこのテンプレートをコピーして使えます

ホワイトボード プレビュー

プレビュー表示中 Academic Writing Roadmap — from question to outline, citations, and revision
無料登録してこのテンプレートを使う

ホワイトボード プレビュー

What finished looks like The five stages Claim, evidence, and source by chapter How to use each source Background, once Load-bearing Leave it out Verify first Traps before you submit Academic Writing ... How to use: 1) Fi... Requirements &amp... Format & cita... Where marks are lost Points taken from... Submission termsDue 20 Aug, 17:00. 2,800 words +/-10%, at least 5 references, chaptered, submitted as PDF. Marking criteriaClarity of question 40%, strength of evidence 30%, structure 20%, format 10%. Spend time in that order. Easy marks lostMissing citations. Trace second-hand quotes to the original; if you can't, write "as cited in". QuestionCopy the brief and narrow the report to one question with a clear scope. ResearchFive search terms, ten sources. Favour peer-reviewed and primary work. OutlineSet the chapters and fill claim, evidence, and source for each row. DraftWrite the chapters whose rows are full, citing as you go. ReviseSleep on it, read aloud, check length, format, and missing citations. Claim Evidence Source Intro Question: does remote work raise output? This paper argues yes, conditionally One paragraph showing that prior studies disagree Two cites: Bloom et al. 2015; government survey 2024 Body 1 Cutting the commute adds usable working time 80 min round trip x 5 days = 6.7 hours freed a week A national time-use survey (2021) Body 2 But junior staff lose learning opportunities In-house data: face-to-face questions halved Yang et al. 2022, Nature Human Behaviour Conclusion The effect splits by role and years of experience Contrasting Body 1 and Body 2 sets the conditions No new sources; reuse the ones already cited 縦軸: Reliability (... Reliable but far from the question. One quoted line in the intro, no more. Peer-reviewed and on point. One per claim; read closely and summarize. Aggregator posts with no sourcing. Drop them and find the primary work. On topic but personal blogs. Footnote only if you reach the original data. Over the limitThe body ran to 3,200 words. Cut duplicated examples first; keep the claims and recaps. Consistent formatAuthor, year, page for every citation. Order the reference list alphabetically by surname. A fix that workedSwapping "I think X" for "X appears to hold, because Y" made the argument land. Final checkExport to PDF and look for broken tables. Name the file "studentID_name".
100%

ドラッグで移動・ホイールで拡大縮小

タスクボードの内容

Not started 15件

Set the question
Gather sources
Build the outline
Draft the body
Revise and submit
List the assignment
Boil it to one line
Pick 5 search terms
List 10 sources
Set the chapters
One claim per part
Start with the body
Cite as you write
Reread after a day
Check format rules

Researching 0件

Outline & draft 0件

Drafting 0件

Final check 0件