Competitor Analysis Matrix (Comparison & Positioning)

Business & Strategy

Competitor Analysis Matrix (Comparison & Positioning)

Open this template with marketing and sales before you scope a new feature or refresh the sales deck. The whiteboard holds a frame for choosing rivals and criteria, a comparison table of you, Rival A and Rival B across price, features and customer base, a positioning map of price against feature breadth, a mind map of differentiation candidates, and a frame with the update rules. The task board carries four parent tasks with three children each: choose competitors, gather source data, fill the table, and decide how to win.

Read more Show less

Use it when everyone talks about competitors but nobody agrees on their pricing or features, and the comparison table never gets updated. It fits a planner searching for how to do a competitive analysis or a comparison table template, and a salesperson rebuilding a pitch deck. Even someone handed competitor research for the first time can see exactly what to look up.

Start by writing your target rivals and criteria in Who we compare against and What we compare on, and skim Common mistakes before you research. Fill Comparison table (worked example) row by row, keeping price, features and customer base at the same detail level. Then place all three companies in Positioning (place all three players), and widen your angles in Map the differentiation candidates. Close by leaving the next review date and owner in What we decide next. The board runs To Do, Research, Analysis, and Shared, moving each finished item right.

Aim to finish Gather source data in week one; it's realistic to fill most of the table from public information alone. Capping a task at a number, like Read 10 reviews, keeps research from dragging on. A month later, meet on the date set in Set a refresh date and check whether pricing or features have changed, so the table doesn't go stale.

0 Likes 0 Copies Author: WeProcess
Competitors Marketing Research Positioning
Sign up free and use this template

Once you have a free account, you can copy this template from the marketplace

Whiteboard preview

Preview mode Competitor Analysis Matrix (Comparison & Positioning)

Whiteboard preview

Who we compare against What we compare on Common mistakes Comparison table (worked example) Positioning (place all three players) Low price x broad features High price x broad features Low price x narrow features High price x narrow features What we decide next Competitor Analys... How to use: 1) Ch... Decisions & m... Research rules Pitfalls Findings & so... Rival A: direct competitor at our price point, e.g. a local kanban tool Rival B: the larger all-in-one player, e.g. a global work suite Workaround: doing it without a tool, e.g. spreadsheets plus chat Price: entry monthly rate and the one-year cost for ten seats Features: how far each rival goes on our three core features Customers: size, industry and region visible in public case studies Copying claims straight out of a sales deck Listing only the criteria where we happen to win Treating a six-month-old price page as current Us Rival A Rival B Price E.g. $X per seat/month, 5 seats minimum, 2 months free on annual. Note the free tier too. (checked 06/01) E.g. $X per seat/month. Put the one-year cost for ten seats next to it. (checked 06/01) E.g. three plans, needed features only in the top one, so real cost is roughly double. (checked 06/01) Features E.g. whiteboard and task management live on the same screen. E.g. strong kanban, but diagrams require an external integration. E.g. broad feature set, yet many settings make the initial rollout slow. Customers E.g. teams of 5 to 50; public stories skew to agencies and studios. E.g. mostly local startups; pitches responsive same-language support. E.g. multinationals above 1,000 staff, with IT leading the rollout. 縦軸: Feature bread... The most crowded space. Winning here means beating others on support quality or time to first value. The all-in-one ground the large players defend. Avoid being compared head-on by feature count. Sits right next to free tools. Stay too long and you end up in a discount war you cannot exit. Specialist territory. Strong if one industry really needs it, provided you can name the job in one sentence. Map the different... Why theychoose us Price framing Compare 10-seat cost Feature mix Board plus tasks Switching CSV import path Time to value Usable on day one Support Same-day replies Where it landsDecide whether these findings go into the sales deck, the public site, or both, and name an owner. Refresh cadencePricing quarterly, features whenever a rival announces a release. Agree who reviews it as well. Keep the trailLeave the date checked and the source URL in every cell. Any row without a source gets re-researched, not reused.
100%

Drag to move, scroll to zoom

Task board contents

To Do 16 items

Choose competitors
Gather source data
Fill the table
Decide how to win
Narrow to 3 rivals
Set 5 compare axes
List your sources
Save pricing pages
List key features
Read 10 reviews
Fill the price row
Fill the feature row
Fill the segment row
Plot the position
Write 3 win paths
Set a refresh date

Research 0 items

Analysis 0 items

Shared 0 items

← Back to templates