Competitor Analysis Matrix (Comparison & Positioning)

ビジネス企画・戦略

Competitor Analysis Matrix (Comparison & Positioning)

Open this template with marketing and sales before you scope a new feature or refresh the sales deck. The whiteboard holds a frame for choosing rivals and criteria, a comparison table of you, Rival A and Rival B across price, features and customer base, a positioning map of price against feature breadth, a mind map of differentiation candidates, and a frame with the update rules. The task board carries four parent tasks with three children each: choose competitors, gather source data, fill the table, and decide how to win.

0 いいね 0 コピー 作者: WeProcess
Competitors Marketing Research Positioning
無料登録してこのテンプレートを使う

無料登録すると、マーケットプレイスからこのテンプレートをコピーして使えます

ホワイトボード プレビュー

プレビュー表示中 Competitor Analysis Matrix (Comparison & Positioning)

ホワイトボード プレビュー

Who we compare against What we compare on Common mistakes Comparison table (worked example) Positioning (place all three players) Low price x broad features High price x broad features Low price x narrow features High price x narrow features What we decide next Competitor Analys... How to use: 1) Ch... Decisions & m... Research rules Pitfalls Findings & so... Rival A: direct competitor at our price point, e.g. a local kanban tool Rival B: the larger all-in-one player, e.g. a global work suite Workaround: doing it without a tool, e.g. spreadsheets plus chat Price: entry monthly rate and the one-year cost for ten seats Features: how far each rival goes on our three core features Customers: size, industry and region visible in public case studies Copying claims straight out of a sales deck Listing only the criteria where we happen to win Treating a six-month-old price page as current Us Rival A Rival B Price E.g. $X per seat/month, 5 seats minimum, 2 months free on annual. Note the free tier too. (checked 06/01) E.g. $X per seat/month. Put the one-year cost for ten seats next to it. (checked 06/01) E.g. three plans, needed features only in the top one, so real cost is roughly double. (checked 06/01) Features E.g. whiteboard and task management live on the same screen. E.g. strong kanban, but diagrams require an external integration. E.g. broad feature set, yet many settings make the initial rollout slow. Customers E.g. teams of 5 to 50; public stories skew to agencies and studios. E.g. mostly local startups; pitches responsive same-language support. E.g. multinationals above 1,000 staff, with IT leading the rollout. 縦軸: Feature bread... The most crowded space. Winning here means beating others on support quality or time to first value. The all-in-one ground the large players defend. Avoid being compared head-on by feature count. Sits right next to free tools. Stay too long and you end up in a discount war you cannot exit. Specialist territory. Strong if one industry really needs it, provided you can name the job in one sentence. Map the different... Why theychoose us Price framing Compare 10-seat cost Feature mix Board plus tasks Switching CSV import path Time to value Usable on day one Support Same-day replies Where it landsDecide whether these findings go into the sales deck, the public site, or both, and name an owner. Refresh cadencePricing quarterly, features whenever a rival announces a release. Agree who reviews it as well. Keep the trailLeave the date checked and the source URL in every cell. Any row without a source gets re-researched, not reused.
100%

ドラッグで移動・ホイールで拡大縮小

タスクボードの内容

To Do 16件

Choose competitors
Gather source data
Fill the table
Decide how to win
Narrow to 3 rivals
Set 5 compare axes
List your sources
Save pricing pages
List key features
Read 10 reviews
Fill the price row
Fill the feature row
Fill the segment row
Plot the position
Write 3 win paths
Set a refresh date

Research 0件

Analysis 0件

Shared 0件