Decision Matrix: Compare Options with Weighted Scoring

ビジネス企画・戦略

Decision Matrix: Compare Options with Weighted Scoring

For a team stuck comparing options, opened before the decision meeting and used until the call is made. The whiteboard holds a frame for the question and the scoring rules, a weighted matrix of options against criteria, a flow of the five steps that lead to the call, a quadrant for what to do when scores are close, and a frame for what to record afterward. The task board moves work from open questions through research and scoring into decided and handed off, and starts with four parent tasks - framing, setting criteria, scoring, and recording the call - each with its own subtasks.

0 いいね 0 コピー 作者: WeProcess
decision making evaluation matrix weighted scoring comparing options alignment
無料登録してこのテンプレートを使う

無料登録すると、マーケットプレイスからこのテンプレートをコピーして使えます

ホワイトボード プレビュー

プレビュー表示中 Decision Matrix: Compare Options with Weighted Scoring

ホワイトボード プレビュー

1. What Are We Deciding (settle this ... 2. Weighted Scoring Matrix (numbers a... 3. The Five Steps to a Decision (work... 4. When the Scores Are Close Research, then decide The decider calls it Run a small trial Hand it to an owner 5. What to Record Once You've Decided Decision Matrix How to use: 1. Fr... Decision Scoring rules Risks & concerns To verify The questionExample: How do we cut the time spent on invoices?Decide by: __/__ Decider: ____ Scoring rules- One to five on every criterion, five is better- Lower risk scores higher- Weights add up to ten Cost of not decidingExample: 20 hours a month of manual work continues.Price the delay before you compare. Out of scope todayExample: reorganizing the whole team.If it comes up, park it somewhere else. Impact (weight 3) Cost (weight 2) Speed (weight 2) Risk (weight 3) A: Improve current 3Saves 20 hrs a month as-is 5No new spend, staff time only 4Can switch in two weeks 4Easy to undo if it fails B: Buy a tool 5Manual work nearly disappears 2$2,000 upfront plus $350 a month 2Two months to migrate and train 2Wasted entirely if nobody adopts it C: Outsource 4Hands the whole process off 1$1,000 a month, fixed 3Can start within a month 3Quality swings when their staff changes 1. Frame the questionWrite the decision in one sentence and cut the field to three real options. 2. Pick the criteriaChoose the four criteria that actually drive the call and fold overlaps together. 3. Set the weightsSplit ten points across the criteria and lock them before any scoring starts. 4. Score the optionsGather the real numbers, then have everyone score one to five on their own. 5. Decide and recordTotal the weighted scores, then write the reason and the review trigger. 縦軸: Cost of rever... Hard to reverse and thin evidence. Pick the one number that would settle it and go get it by a date. Hard to reverse but the evidence is in. Don't defer - make the call and set the review trigger with it. Cheap to reverse. Try one option for two weeks and write the keep-or-kill bar before you start. Cheap to reverse and the evidence is in. Skip the meeting, let the owner decide, and post the result. The decisionExample: We trial option A from Feb 1. Called by: Sara.One sentence everyone reads. Review triggerExample: revisit option B if we save under 10 hours by month three.Always a number and a date. Objections raisedExample: we are underestimating the migration effort.Keep the dissent. It usually matters later.
100%

ドラッグで移動・ホイールで拡大縮小

タスクボードの内容

Open Questions 15件

Frame the decision
Set criteria weights
Score every option
Decide and record
Narrow to 3 options
Set decider and date
Pick four criteria
Split 10 weight pts
Define the scale
Gather the numbers
Score separately
Discuss the gaps
Add up the scores
Write the reason
Set a review trigger

Gathering Info 0件

Scoring 0件

Decided 0件

Handed Off 0件